Home
WyldRaven
wyldraven
....::::: .: .:::..
Welcome
Within the pages of my journal you will find mostly rants and commentary on topics of concern to me. Currently, those would include the illegal occupation of Iraq, human rights, the threat of theocracy, and the U. S. Presidency of Barack Obama.

If these things interest you as well, read on. If you wish to engage in attack debate, simply move on. I won't respond to you. If you are interested in honest debate, and have an open mind, then I welcome you.

Oh, and one more thing. I believe Bush 43 was the worst president ever to hold that office in the history of the United States. I am unashamed of that opinion.

Truth
If your actions harm no one, then they are ethical. The reverse is not necessarily true.

Motto
Nolite te bastardes carborundorum

The Handmaid's Tale
Margaret Atwood



October 2009
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Older Viewing 0 - 20  
WyldRaven [userpic]
OK, this is change, but I can't say I believe in it

How I feel: disappointed

The Obama justice system - Glenn Greenwald

Highlighting not mine.
[...] Spencer Ackerman yesterday attended a Senate hearing at which the DOD's General Counsel, Jeh Johnson, testified.  As Ackerman highlighted, Johnson actually said that even for those detainees to whom the Obama administration deigns to give a real trial in a real court, the President has the power to continue to imprison them indefinitely even if they are acquitted at their trial.  About this assertion of "presidential post-acquittal detention power" -- an Orwellian term (and a Kafka-esque concept) that should send shivers down the spine of anyone who cares at all about the most basic liberties -- Ackerman wrote, with some understatement, that it "moved the Obama administration into new territory from a civil liberties perspective."
Law professor Jonathan Turley was more blunt:  "The Obama Administration continues its retention and expansion of abusive Bush policies — now clearly Obama policies on indefinite detention." [...]
I cannot express how disgusted I am. Read the entire thing, if you have the stomach for it.


WyldRaven [userpic]
Olbermann on Diane Schroer and the Library of Congress

Where I am: 77095
How I feel: annoyed

The Library of Congress is being sued because it offered a key job as terrorism research analyst to Diane Schroer, then rescinded the offer, even though she was qualified. In Bushed, Keith Olbermann explains the job was taken away because everything Schroer accomplished was before her sex change operation.
Olbermann takes the administration to task for firing an eminently qualified terror expert because she is undergoing sex reassignment. So, is there a war on terror, or just a war on civil rights?

Video: Sex change causes loss of government job


WyldRaven [userpic]
No laughing matter

How I feel: angry

From the ACLU:

This sounds so outrageous, it seems like a joke or something out of "The Onion."

Attorney General Michael Mukasey is demanding that Congress issue a new declaration of war so that anyone that this president or the next one declares to be an "enemy combatant" can be held indefinitely without a trial.

The new declaration of war would make the entire globe — including the United States itself — a “battlefield” where the president decides who will be locked up forever.

With only five weeks left in the Congressional schedule and only six months left in the Bush presidency, Mukasey’s ridiculous power grab should be laughed out of town. But given this Congress’ track record, the Mukasey proposal is no laughing matter. Especially because it also includes a cover-up of the Bush administration’s systemic torture and abuse of detainees.

We can’t take for granted that Congress will reject this outrageous proposal. We have to meet it with an immediate wall of protest that says to Congress: “Don’t you dare.”

I just told my members of Congress to reject the dangerous Bush/Mukasey plan. You can do the same thing here:

http://action.aclu.org/mukasey
Mukasey Urges Legislation For Guantanamo Trials


WyldRaven [userpic]
Global assassination - A failed policy

Philip K. Dick, Meet George W. Bush by Tom Engelhardt

Excerpt. Click headline for full story. )
How would it feel if the shoe were on the other foot?


WyldRaven [userpic]
Are we about to got to war with Iran?

How I feel: uncomfortable

It’s the ‘Oh Shit!’ Moment on Iran

Excerpt. Click headline for full story. )
Yep, I have to agree with this author.


WyldRaven [userpic]
The "US doesn't torture" (except when we do)

How I feel: cranky

Rude Pundit: A Conversation in High Places Regarding Torture

Excerpt. Click Headline for full story. )
"You have to ask yourself, 'At the end of the day, what kind of person do I want to be?'" Indeed, it does seem that the citizens of this fine nation have made that decision.
Excerpt. Click Headline for full story. )


WyldRaven [userpic]
We really helped Iraq, didn't we?

How I feel: sad

City in a Time Warp
War is pushing Baghdad out of the 21st century and back to a bygone age of ferrymen, midwives, donkey drivers and shepherds.

Excerpt. Click Headline for full story. )


WyldRaven [userpic]
Two years ago today

How I feel: angry

Two years ago today the government (local, state, and federal) failed New Orleans. And all levels, particularly federal, have been failing Nawlins since then. No, that's not entirely true. The government had been failing New Orleans for decades. Two years ago is when that failure came home to roost.

Yesterday on the ABC Nightly News, I saw how the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is "repairing" the levee system, with construction that even the Corps acknowledges would not withstand a hurricane half the size of Katrina. Read more... ) But we can spend $450 billion and counting to wage war against a nebulous "terrorist threat" be in the middle of a civil war in Iraq.


WyldRaven [userpic]
Jose Padilla was convicted yesterday

How I feel: cynical

Salon: The Padilla verdict -- Glenn Greenwald

Excerpt. Click Headline for full story. )
So they managed to convict him, and it only took 5 years, three and a half of which he spent in a naval brig, held incommunicado, without charges, and under continual torture, simply because George Bush said so. What a day to be proud of this nation. </sarcasm>


WyldRaven [userpic]
FBI visits man suspected of reading in public

How I feel: aggravated

Careful: The FB-eye may be watching
Reading the wrong thing in public can get you in trouble

Excerpt. Click Headline for full story. )
This is how the government spends wastes my tax dollars? When domestic terrorists are threatening to kill biology professors for teaching evolution, and bombs are found at the front doors of Planned Parenthood clinics? They send agents to check out reports of a man reading? Even a "dark, bearded man"? This is the madness BushCo has wrought upon my nation. Joe McCarthy only wishes he could have done as much damage to the United States as George Bush.

The paranoia of the average citizen of this nation is reaching epic levels. And we have people like Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, telling us that his gut tells him we are in for a major attack this summer, to thank for it. Things are out of control in the Executive branch. People are losing respect for Bush in droves. I know, let's ramp up the terror level.

BTW: For those of you who have not met me in real life, I am a "dark, bearded man". Sometimes I even read. In public.

Sourced by [info]catvincent. Yes, I know the original story is from 2003.


WyldRaven [userpic]
Has anyone checked the temperature of Hell lately?

How I feel: shocked

Bush bars cruel, inhuman treat of terrorism suspects

Excerpt. Click Headline for full story. )
Maybe he is afraid he'll die in the colonoscopy and have to face judgment?


WyldRaven [userpic]
Gee, I wonder why?

How I feel: aggravated

Government report: Al Qaeda strongest since September 11, 2001

Excerpt. Click Headline for full story. )
Could it be because we gave them a perfect cause célèbre upon which to base their recruiting? Or perhaps because Saddam was doing an excellent job of suppressing them in Iraq, and now he is deposed? Naaah. Couldn't be that...


WyldRaven [userpic]
Now this is a Republican who "gets it".

How I feel: surprised

Anti-war Republican Rep. Wayne Gilchrest on Iraq, the Bush administration, and the "dissolving" GOP

Excerpt. Click Headline for full story. )
Gilchrest smells the coffee. He is one of maybe four who really do.


WyldRaven [userpic]
My respect for John Edwards just jumped a couple of notches

How I feel: contemplative

Edwards Confronts GOP on War on Terror

Excerpt. Click Headline for full story. )
Now those are the fighting words I have been waiting to hear from a Democrat. It's about time someone went head on against the BushCo machine.

ETA: Edwards has admitted voting to go to war with Iraq was an error on his part. Read the MSNBC transcript here.


WyldRaven [userpic]
But Bush couldn't be bothered to go before them

How I feel: angry

FISA rejected zero wire-tap requests in 2006

Highlights. Click Headline for full story. )
This really speaks for itself.


WyldRaven [userpic]
War with Iran in 3 weeks?

How I feel: distressed

Does Bush Think War with Iran Is Preordained?

My opinion? Probably. And Chris Hedges seems to think so as well. Follow the link to read this very important and terrifying article. Or just click the cut below...

Read more... )
With thanks to [info]fooltheworld in [info]dark_christian for bringing this to my attention here.


WyldRaven [userpic]
Real investigative reporting

How I feel: impressed

Olbermann accepts President Clinton's challenge to assess Bush record on terror in his first 8 months

It doesn't look good for Bush, and seems to support Clinton's assertions. Watch it for yourself.


WyldRaven [userpic]
Even Spy vs. Spy knows it's true

How I feel: determined

Iraq War Hurting U.S. Terror Fight, Creating More Terrorists

Spy Agencies Say Iraq War Hurting U.S. Terror Fight
By Karen DeYoung
Excerpt )

Conventional wisdom on this one has been that the longer we occupy Iraq, the longer we give the militants U. S. soldiers as targets, the more angry the region becomes. As that region sees our imperialism continue unabated, they will be more likely to agree with the fundamentalist Islamists, and more willing to attack us and what we stand for. It's not our freedoms they hate any more, if it ever was. It's our imperialistic agenda, our paternalistic imposition of "democracy" upon the region, our continued support for the rogue nation of Israel and it's unprovoked attacks upon its neighbors.

Read more... )


WyldRaven [userpic]
Do we want to be "the moral equals of Torquemada or the Jacobins"?

Bush Is Gonna Take His Iron Maiden and Go Home:

Here's how you know you've lost your war: Chair of the House Homeland Security Committee Peter King said this about detainee treatment legislation: "If we capture bin Laden tomorrow and we have to hold his head under water to find out when the next attack is going to happen, we ought to be able to do it." Let's put it this way: it's one thing to say that in a one-in-a-million Jack Bauer-esque situation, you'd probably break the law and a few fingers to get the info you need so the nuke doesn't go off. But it's another thing entirely to say that you wanna make it the law.
< Cut for language >
This is what we've been reduced to as a nation: arguing with each other over how far we can push our notions of "civilized" and still feel good about ourselves. How low can we go? 'Cause, see, once you take one step down on a ladder, the next rung is right there, and the bottom gets ever closer.
There's much more at the link above, but as always, he's called the Rude Pundit for a reason.


WyldRaven [userpic]
Interesting analysis of Hamdan v. Rumsfeld

The significance of Hamdan v. Rumsfeld by Glenn Greenwald

States Mr. Greenwald: For the past 10 years, I was a litigator in NYC specializing in First Amendment challenges, civil rights cases, and corporate and securities fraud matters. I am the author of the New York Times Best-Selling book, How Would A Patriot Act?, a critique of the Bush administration's use of executive power, released May, 2006.
Excerpt from the actual analysis:
Nonetheless, opponents of monarchical power should celebrate this decision. It has been some time since real limits were placed on the Bush administration in the area of national security. The rejection of the President's claims to unlimited authority with regard to how Al Qaeda prisoners are treated is extraordinary and encouraging by any measure. The decision is an important step towards re-establishing the principle that there are three co-equal branches of government and that the threat of terrorism does not justify radical departures from the principles of government on which our country was founded.
There are several other salient points made, regarding how the current regime could go about ignoring this (by making legislative changes), as well as what this means for the central defense offered to date to support the illegal wiretapping and surveillance schemes. Well worth the read.

In addition, it looks like I have found yet another book I need to read. (And to try and find it in a library near you, click here.)


Older Viewing 0 - 20  

Advertisement